Romans 8:6-11
John 11:1-45
We are not told specifically what it was
that drove Jesus to tears, but we can be reasonably sure Jesus was quite
capable of empathizing with (that is,
sharing and feeling) the emotions of those who so deeply grieved at Lazarus'
death. Jesus could feel human emotions
because He was Himself as fully human as He is fully Divine. He is no less capable of feeling our pain and
grief now than He was when He walked the earth.
Reflecting on this, then, I got hung up
on this one tiny verse among these forty-five verses of Lazarus' resurrection
story: "Jesus began to weep."
We've read in other stories how Jesus was moved with compassion
or pity or profound love, but this is the only verse I can think of that speaks
directly of Jesus shedding tears of sorrow for others. What makes Jesus shed tears for and with us?
You may be aware of World Vision, a credible
Christian humanitarian organization through which we can sponsor children on
just about every continent in the world.
You may also be aware of World Vision's controversial decision a few
weeks ago to allow the hiring of same-gender couples who are legally
married. Yet only two days later World
Vision did an about-face on this decision because of the outcry from the
evangelical world. They were compelled
to backtrack because thousands of sponsors either withheld their financial support
or threatened to do so.
Now we conservatives may believe some
victory for Christian purity was achieved in this dispute, but it could only be
a hollow victory at best. Thousands of
children from impoverished countries around the world who depend on this
generosity were put at risk - if only for a day or two (shall we go two full
days without food or clean water??).
As I was reading about this dispute, I
could envision a newly sponsored child getting her first decent meal in weeks -
or maybe ever! She is about to sit down
and enjoy this meal when while she is saying a prayer for her new sponsor - BY
NAME! - who made the meal possible, suddenly the tray is pulled away and she is
sent home ... because her sponsor whose name she now knows stopped payment on
the check which had paid for that meal.
Surely in such a moment "Jesus began to weep."
I am pretty sure it was not quite that
dramatic or sudden, but it is necessary
for us to insert ourselves into these real-life stories as representatives of
Christ Himself in order get a glimpse of how such drama would play out, what
our part in the story would be, and how we might react under similar
circumstances.
How might we feel if that child had been
our own? How might we react if we were
the World Vision missionaries "on the ground" where the child is and,
having told this child of her new American sponsor BY NAME, look her in the eye
and say, "I'm sorry. They changed
their mind." Surely in that moment,
"Jesus
began to weep". And most
likely, perhaps most importantly, a heart of flesh would turn to stone.
Our Lord would surely weep for a child
whose hopes for nourishing food, preventive health care, clean drinking water,
and the chance for an education were suddenly taken away; but I also think
Jesus would weep even more for those who would use money - or a child - as a
political pawn to get their own way.
After all, these are also the ones for whom Jesus gave up His life! I have to believe the outcry and protest came
from well-meaning people who probably believed they were doing the right thing
by withholding their financial support in order to force World Vision into an
ideal of their own vision.
This happens in churches all across America,
not one excluded. Money is the one
"weapon" many believe they have that will get someone's attention. It is the one tangible thing we can do to
make known our personal displeasure. Frankly,
I am not sure why World Vision would find it necessary to make such a public
announcement knowing some would be antagonized.
Were they so naive? Or were they
so bold? Even in that moment, World
Vision took their eye off the ball and lost sight of their own mission.
Maybe they simply could not imagine earnest,
generous, and devoted Christians who would do such a thing as to offer hope to
a hungry child in Armenia, for instance, and then pull it away - for any reason,
let alone a political reason that has nothing to do with charity, nothing to do
with Divine Love. It is rather an act
that betrays the reality that every dollar we have may well be earned by our
hands but is claimed by our Lord! Like
every other blessing, even money is not "ours" to withhold!
I think, however, the reason it was so
easy for these thousands to threaten to withhold their support is because while
they may be sympathetic to a hungry child as I believe we all are, it is
virtually impossible to empathize
with such a child because we are so far removed geographically and financially
- perhaps even spiritually. It is very
difficult, if not impossible to empathize
with anyone if we have not ourselves suffered similar challenges or watched our
own children do without basic needs.
Our theology of plenty does not allow a
lot of wiggle room when it comes to fully understanding what people in other
parts of the world have to deal with on a daily basis, and even folks in this
country who struggle don't get a lot of sympathy because of our national
doctrine of "rugged individualism" and equal opportunity. We reason that our own success, however
limited, can be as easily enjoyed by others if they are willing to do the work
and put in the hours because we simply cannot imagine otherwise. Hard work got us what we wanted; why can't it
be so for others?
Even Bible stories are hard for us to understand
because these events took place so long ago and in another culture completely
alien to us. I think maybe this is the
reason we can so easily take a small snippet of Scripture away from its context
and try to force it into our own setting - because we do not understand the
cultural context it came from.
Historians and archaeologists can give us a pretty good idea of what
other cultures looked like, but we can never fully empathize with something we have never experienced ourselves.
Jesus was sharing the emotions of those
who were around Him. He was WITH them,
He was one of them, and so He was sharing
the grief they suffered rather than merely observing. It is part of the Christian doctrine which teaches
that our Lord shared our humanity so we may hope to one day share in His
divinity as co-heirs in the Kingdom of Heaven.
But what this doctrine also expresses is an understanding of our fully sharing
in His ministry as the Body of Christ in the world today in "bearing one
another's burdens" as Jesus was surely doing in this moment with Mary and
her friends.
We can pick our battles (or our own
poison!) as we will, but we can never be selective when it comes to faith and
evangelism; that is, sharing the Gospel in practical ways as St. Paul and St.
James demanded of their audiences ('not only hearers, but DOERS of the Law'). We cannot be selective about who is worthy of
the Gospel of our Lord, and we must never try to manipulate by any means an
outcome that suits our personal preferences - especially at the expense of a
hungry child or the mission of the Holy Church which is Christ in the world
today.
The choices are not always easy, of
course, because we often let our emotions get in the way; but we must always
remember that the fullness of Christ in the world today is weakened when we who
call ourselves "disciples" or think ourselves "saved" would
withdraw our support and participation by any
means. That is not Jesus, the One
who sat and ate with what was considered the worst of humanity! Even with what we believe to be the noblest
of intentions, we can still grieve the Spirit if we do not stop to count the
cost of our protest, consider more seriously any potential "collateral
damage", and remember who will ultimately be harmed rather than helped; it will always be the weakest
among us. Always. And Jesus
will surely weep.
"If Christ is in you ... the
Spirit is life because of righteousness." We are the Body of Christ, and "the
world is our parish", even (perhaps especially)
the world we do not always agree with - for He died for them as well. We can never allow needless suffering when it
is within our power to alleviate such suffering. And when we act in accordance with the
righteousness of Christ our Lord, "many" who see us suffering WITH THEM - as they saw Jesus at the tomb of Lazarus - will
believe in Him ... because we, too, truly and deeply believe. Amen.