Monday, November 25, 2019

Transformed Life: the one which never thirsts


24 November 2019

2 Samuel 12:1-15; Hebrews 5:12-6:3; John 4:7-15

The mission of every Arkansas United Methodist Church is to “create vital congregations that make disciples of Jesus Christ, who make disciples equipped and sent to transform lives, communities, and the world”. 

I would add that before this mission can be fulfilled, the Church may be in need of transformation; to go from being social or civic clubs for like-minded people to becoming the True and Everlasting Body of Christ.  For this to be, the Church must be filled with “vitality” and zeal for not only making disciples but for becoming disciples ourselves, equipped and sent forth to the Church’s sole mission.

Over the years, however, the depth of what it means to be transformed has become muddled, even to the point of being confused with conversion or salvation.  Rarely is it understood as a process of “going on to perfection”; disavowing old practices and developing and supporting new and more holy habits through the spiritual discipline of the means of grace – including accountability. 

Transformation has either been forgotten altogether or has been reduced, at least in the individual mind, to a single event rather than being understood as a constant evolution, a metamorphosis of mind, heart, and soul; metamorphosis to be understood as a “change of the form or nature of a person into a completely different one, by natural or supernatural means” (dictionary.com) – but NOT by magic.

This is to say, our concept of “getting saved” as the end and the point of evangelism is only the means to a greater end, the beginning of a greater Journey.  Sanctification is a key characteristic of Wesleyan Methodism; that we are “going on to perfection” with accountability, with the help and support of fellow disciples.  If we are not “growing on the vine” (John 15:5), we are dying – and taking everyone we love with us.

I began thinking about King David, his tryst with Bathsheba, and the fallout that impacted all Israel.  The Scriptures refer to David as “a man after The Lord’s heart”, but what we probably notice more often in David’s life – apart from his standing against Goliath - are his scandals.  We rarely notice these are the things we struggle with ourselves – especially when we get a little too full of ourselves. 

We want to be intimately connected to The Lord, but there are too many compelling distractions and concepts of “cheap grace” that pull us away.  Yet what we do not often see in David’s life is the depth of sin and its social implications when we do pull away and lose our sense of self in The Lord. 

After Bathsheba, and David ordering her husband’s death to hide the scandal of her pregnancy, we find what some see as a very cruel God who took the life of an innocent child as David’s punishment.  Though David’s sin was “put away” after his confession, we still see David’s entire life condemned to that of war and “trouble against [him] from within [his] own house” (2 Sam 12:10, 11).  Not because of a vindictive God but because of his sin which put destruction into motion.

What we do not seem to notice or concern ourselves with – especially in our own sins – is that, by the very destructive nature of sin, someone else will always suffer with us, if not because of us.  Just as there can be no such thing as “private faith” in “going on to perfection”, there can be no such thing as “private sin” – just as The Lord spoke to David: “You did it in secret, but I will do this thing before all Israel …”
           
The point of King David’s story may not be exclusively about Divine Wrath more than it is about what happens to us and those around us when we pull away from our very Source of Life, forget who we really are, who we were created and called to be, and go our own way.  In many ways, I do try to go it alone just as I see many of you stuck in that same lifeless rut.  When I do allow myself to fall into that rut, I can feel the emptiness and hear the silence that comes from within that void.  You would think I would have learned by now, but that’s not always how it works for those of a more stubborn nature. 

It is written in the Letter to the Colossians, “the wrongdoer will be paid back for whatever wrong has been done, without partiality”, {that is, whether we call ourselves “saved” or not} 3:25).  So even though there is a price to be paid for my failures, there is still hope; there is still redemption.  The Lord cannot defy His own merciful nature by punishing us strictly for being human, frail as we often are. 

But that’s the kicker, isn’t it?  The transformed life is about being aware of our base human nature, learning from our failures and our sins, and rising above it all rather than settling in it, surrendering to it, and expecting Jesus to come along for the ride.  That is when He ceases to be our Shepherd and Teacher and becomes a lifeless dashboard icon or a good-luck charm. 

Even though we do fail, the whole concept of Grace is to remind us that as long as we strive for “perfection” (Hebrews 6:1), there is always temptation, but there is always Mercy, there is always redemption found in our confession in acknowledging our sins.  It does not mean our sins are overlooked or covered in perpetuity by Jesus’ death because there will be fallout.  It means we are loved enough that we must learn our lessons, sometimes the hard way – and often, more than once.

Our lives are not – and must never be – defined by any single moment.  Whether it is a moment of failure or a moment of spiritual clarity, “going on to perfection” pulls us forward from those moments.  Sometimes it can even be – and maybe should always be - that our moments of failure become moments of spiritual clarity – like for King David or the woman at the well – but only if there are those who care enough about us to call us on our failures.  These moments of failure to clarity cannot happen without accountability from within The Word and our fellow disciples.

We don’t often or easily see our failures unless we are called on them.  We don’t have to be beat over the head with our sins, but we do need to be called on those sins and know by the Word that, while we will be accountable, there is still mercy and redemption after confession.  We need not be defined by our failures; we need to know which way to go from those failures.

David’s life is an interesting one.  When he stood against Goliath, we heard his indignation for the man who would dare curse his God.  He always meant well, and what was within his heart was pleasing enough for the God of Israel to have him anointed king.  What is most interesting, however, is not strictly the tension between David’s righteousness and his humanness. 

It is that when the prophet Nathan called him on his sin through a parable, David was outraged over the circumstances of the parable – as he was with Goliath, and as we often are when we see the sins of others - but David did not see himself and his actions in the parable.  Nor can we see our own failures when we are alone – or – when we concern ourselves with the sins of others rather than concern ourselves with the Eternal Word.

The transformed life is a challenging one.  Though David was anointed as king, he still had to reach for it to fulfill the life he was called and anointed into.  It is no less so for us; for though we may not be kings or queens, we are of no lesser value in the truly transformed community or in the eyes of the merciful God who redeemed us and called us to become the Body of Christ in the world today.  The Church has been entrusted with the Living Water.  We must not waste a single drop.  Amen.

Sunday, November 10, 2019

Ain't Dead Yet


10 November 2019

Haggai 1:15b-2:9; Psalm 145; 2 Thessalonians 2:1-5, 13-17; Luke 20:27-38


It has been said that only through death can one really begin to live.  Dietrich Bonhoeffer, in his book “The Cost of Discipleship”, wrote, “When Christ calls a man, He bids him come and die”.  Yet what Bonhoeffer is expressing has nothing to do with a physical death.  It is, rather, as attributed to St. John the Baptizer, “[The Messiah] must increase, but I must decrease” (John 3:30).

But I must decrease” … seems to suggest that in order for Messiah to have His proper place, John had to stand down. “He must increase, but [in order for Him to increase] I must decrease”.  There is no competition, no race to see who baptizes more, who can draw the larger crowd – a debilitating race the modern Church has lost itself in.  Once Messiah was on the scene, it was time for the Baptizer to fade, to “decrease” … while still very much alive.  What’s more, John was ok with this.

It would be presumptuous to think St. John was referring to his own execution as the means of “decrease” since he had yet to even be arrested.  So, the context is one in which some of John’s disciples had come to him disturbed because all were going to Jesus to be baptized rather than coming to the Baptizer himself; “The One … to whom you testified, here He is baptizing, and all are going to Him” (John 3:26).  John acknowledged it all as what must come to pass; and he ended his discourse with, “He must increase, but I must decrease”. 

The Baptizer had his place, a very important and necessary place - just as you and I do – but unlike many of us, John knew the limit of his place and his time.  He was the one appointed to prepare the way for The Lord, “the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world” (John 1:29).  Over and over, John had been clear to all who would listen that he was not “the One”.

In a manner of speaking, even throughout his ministry, the Baptizer had been sufficiently “decreased”.  He was not looking for his own “best life” because he always understood his life was intimately connected to the Very Source of Life.  Apart from The Lord, John had no life.

Sometimes it seems as though we become so fixated on the Resurrection and what happens to us, we lose sight of the Life we are invited into in the here-and-now.  When we think about the Resurrection, we think only in terms of what happens after the physical death of the body – yet we still try to dictate our own terms.  “What happens next?”, the Sadducees and we want to know.  So in the kingdom of heaven, as Jesus teaches, “those who are considered worthy of a place in that age and in the resurrection from the dead neither marry nor are given in marriage” (Luke 20:35).  In other words, life as we now know it will come to an end – but Life itself goes on in a whole other way, a way we can hardly conceive of except in our own terms.    

The Sadducees believed the five books of Moses were the only authoritative books of Scripture.  Because the Torah lacks a defined doctrine of resurrection, it would be that in these books, those who died were … well, dead.  Even though The Lord refers to Himself as “the God of Abraham, of Isaac, and of Jacob” to Moses (Exodus 3:6), it was maybe considered just a point of reference.  So because these key biblical figures no longer existed in their world, there was no longer a story to tell except in terms of the Covenant.

Yet Jesus used that very reference as proof of “the fact that the dead are raised” (Luke 20:37).  Then in the Transfiguration, we find Moses and Elijah very much alive (Luke 9:30).  So it must follow that The Holy Father would not define Himself in relationship with persons who no longer exist.  Or with death, for that matter; “for He is God not of the dead but of the living, for to Him all of them are alive” (Luke 20:38).

While this exchange should be a source of great comfort in assuring us of Life in the age to come, it has been proved for some to be a source of great conflict.  A lady came to me years ago after a service in which this passage from Luke’s Gospel had been used.  She had been widowed for over ten years, and she still missed her husband.  She had told me before that every waking day for her was a new experience in grief.

So she asked me if this meant she would not be reunited with her beloved husband in heaven since “since they neither marry nor are given in marriage”.  If you can believe it, I was rendered speechless because this question was pretty new to me and caught me completely off guard!  She had been banking on her misery over the past decade to finally be put to rest when she would be reunited with her husband.  To her, and perhaps to many, that is the very essence of heaven.

Admittedly, it is difficult for me to speak to that kind of grief, not having experienced it myself.  Yet it did grieve me to know this Christian lady who had long ago professed faith in Christ was not looking forward to meeting Christ; she only wanted her husband.  She wanted the only life which gave her own life meaning.  I was not - and am still not - going to suggest for one moment this woman’s thoughts are misguided, but I also do think she was asking the wrong question. 

Whatever we may choose to believe about the Resurrection and life in the age to come, we must not be so narrowly focused on our own terms of life that we miss what our Shepherd is trying to teach and lead us to.  He was not trying to one-up the Sadducees.  They asked a legitimate question according to their understanding of Scripture.  Maybe they were trying to set a trap for Jesus, but who among us has not wondered from time to time what the “age to come” will look like? 

But the point Jesus was making was not whether we are still married or will be.  In fact, marriage in the age to come is not even on the table.  He made a clear distinction between this age and the age to come; “those who belong to this age marry and are given in marriagebut those who are considered worthy of a place in that age and in the resurrection from the dead neither marry nor are given in marriage”. 

What can this possibly mean to us?  In some ways, our conflict may be with the terms.  Because we are so wrapped up in this life, a life we can modify however we wish, a life the terms of which we can dictate, Christ cannot have His rightful place because we refuse to “decrease”.  We “ain’t dead yet”, so we want to live … but only on our own terms.  Even when we claim to have received Christ as Lord and Savior, we still have our own terms in the backs of our minds. 

What we must strive for is the “decrease” of self as we “go on to perfection”, as we are sanctified in The Lord.  It occurs to me that the Resurrected Life is the one we can have now.  Life in the “age to come” should not come as a shock to us – it should be a continuation of the Life we have already chosen; the Life in which Christ Jesus really is The Lord, the Boss, the Shepherd.  Only when we “decrease” can He increase.  And when He increases, whether in this life or the Life to come, only then can we really start living as we should – as He intended from the beginning.  Amen
t

Sunday, November 03, 2019

A Reputation Ruined, a Blessing Bestowed


3 November 2019

Daniel 7:1-3, 15-18; Psalm 149; Ephesians 1:11-23; Luke 6:20-31

What makes a bad reputation a good thing?  It depends on whom we are trying to impress.  "Blessed are you when people hate you, and when they exclude you, revile you, and defame you on account of the Son of Man.  Rejoice in that day and leap for joy, for surely your reward is great in heaven; for that is what their ancestors did to the prophets” (Luke 6:22-23).

Approval-seeking behavior – behavior which more likely betrays our truest self - is intended to gain approval from others, but what happens most often is that we risk compromising our integrity, the core of who we are and what we believe.  Some may approve; but if our efforts betray what they thought they knew about us, they will not respect us.  What people generally respect is integrity.  They make not like the person or the beliefs, but they will respect them.  

When people know we are Christians and active members of the Church – regardless of denomination – they have certain expectations based on what they know of us outwardly.  When we fail to live up to those expectations, what they generally believe about Christians, they may like us and may even approve; but when we betray our core beliefs and sacrifice our own integrity for the sake of people-pleasing, of seeking popularity, of fitting in, they lose all respect for us and our beliefs.  Why should they respect our beliefs when we don’t?

Even though St. James warns us against getting too chummy with ‘the world’ (James 4:4), it is not always easy to discern between being responsible citizens and neighbors - and being disloyal disciples betraying our Shepherd; because our behavior is never about our Father’s love for us.  Rather, our behavior is a reflection of our love for our Father.  It’s always easy to say The Lord love us, and it is easier still to say we love The Lord.  Those are only words, however, and people do not always believe what they hear – but they will always believe what they see.

Maybe one of the most difficult challenges for disciples is trying to discern “the world” from which we are to keep a safe distance.  Paul and Peter both encourage us to be good, respectful citizens; and the fundamental Commandment to “love our neighbor as ourselves” can never be brushed aside.

It occurs to me, though, that even though Jesus frames that Commandment as applying to any who are in distress, the distress may not always be a physical one – as in being beaten and left on the side of the road (Good Samaritan, Luke 10:25-37).    

For those who clamber for positive attention from, well, anyone for any reason, there is a profound spiritual distress which cannot be ignored.  Those who try to play on both sides of the fence to hedge their social bets don’t know who they really are.  And they don’t know who they are because they, as creatures themselves, have disconnected themselves from their Creator.  It isn’t only a matter of knowing whether they are condemned or saved; it is entirely about living the life they are ordained to live, being whom they were created to be.

In the Beatitudes, it must first be understood Jesus is speaking primarily to Jews.  It may be safe to say there were certainly some Gentiles in the crowd, but they would not be able to really connect with or relate to the idea of their “ancestors” who glorified “false prophets” (Luke 6:26).  In an appropriate context, this would have been self-proclaimed prophets who told the people what they wanted to hear rather than what they needed to hear.

It must also be noted Jesus is speaking to an exclusive crowd; that is, “I say to you who listen …” (vs 27).  While the primary audience remains unchanged, this is where we Gentiles need to really step up and take to heart what The Good Shepherd is conveying – because we live in a world in which any who disagree – whether politically or socially – with “us” is demonized.  By definition, then, they become “enemies” because they won’t go along. 

That is the reality of the world we have helped to create either by not taking a stand or standing in the wrong place.  Yet our Shepherd turns our own self-created narrative on its head: “Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who abuse you” (vss 27-28). 

Then He goes on to tell us we must take their abuse!  This is where He loses many of us.  While we may not literally walk away from Him at this point, we do still disengage in favor of “self defense”.  And that “do unto others” bit?  Our version is “before they do unto you”. 

That is what our world expects from us.  That is what our culture requires of us.  And this is where it gets really hard for parents – teaching our children to “turn the other cheek”.  What do we teach our children?  Quite the opposite.  Yet it is written in the so-called “Satanic Bible” that if someone strikes you on the cheek, crush his cheek. 

Yet there is a story about President Lincoln who had referred to the people of the South as fellow human beings who are in error.  A lady chastised him for suggesting such a thing, preferring to refer to Southerners as enemies to be destroyed.  The president responded, “Madam, do I not destroy my enemies when I make them my friends?”

Being and doing all Jesus teaches us to do is very hard, sometimes seemingly impossible under certain circumstances.  What is harder still is being labeled a coward by our culture, according to our culture’s standards, by refusing to stand up for and defend ourselves.  But what is most ironic is that we encourage our children to take their school lessons to heart for the sake of becoming successful, we teach them quite the opposite when it comes to religion and faithfulness. 

In spite of it all, however, our Lord teaches this above all else: when we strive for faithfulness, we will see reward.  Poor in spirit, hungry for righteousness, weeping for loneliness when the culture we are most comfortable with turns its back on us because we no longer fit the narrative and are no longer useful to those who use us only for their own gain.

Our Shepherd knows better than anyone what that feels like, so He is not speaking from a void.  He, better than anyone, is painfully aware of human nature; but He also continues to challenge and to strengthen us to rise above it all … “for surely your reward is great in heaven”.  We can reach “higher” – or we can settle for the here-and-now.  That is our choice.

Our reputations may be ruined in the eyes of man, but the Blessing of Heaven is ours.  Now … and forever.  Amen.