Ephesians 2:1-10
Matthew 16:13-27
Pope Francis is an
anomaly to the traditional standards of the Church. Unlike John Paul II or even Benedict who were
very clear about what they opposed, Francis does not often seem to go in that
direction. In a sense, then, I see a lot
of Francis’ conflicts in the same light of Jesus’ conflicts with the religious
authorities of His day.
There is, however, a
particular thing Francis has been extremely vocal about. “We
must not reduce the bosom of the universal church to a nest that protects our
mediocrity.” Pope Francis
I’ve heard it said more
than once that “if your church had this or would do that, we would
attend.” To which we can only answer,
“If you would attend, we could have this or be able to do that.”
But that’s not really the
answer. Attending church services is not quite the same as being the church; and it is certainly
not about coming with an expectation of being entertained. Worship in its fullness is an expression coming
from deep within, but that worshipful expression must also be so powerful and so
all-consuming that it cannot help but to reach beyond the walls and the doors
of the church and well beyond the single hour we devote to worship each week.
Reaching back to the 16th-century
days of the “Father of the Reformation” who is credited with (or blamed for!)
the “works-righteousness” dilemma, Martin Luther still maintained that “Anyone who is to find Christ must first
find the Church”. But he was surely
speaking of much more that simply “going to church”. His observation holds all professing believers
– active or not - accountable to the true meaning of “church” as something worth
being “found”. So if seekers do “find the Church”, the question is will they also find Christ? Because this would be the only church worth
being “found”.
Seekers will much more
likely find Christ through the Church’s faithfulness long before they will find
Christ on their own because Christ is the foundation, heart, and spirit of the
Church’s very existence. Without Christ
and The Covenant, the Church simply does not exist. So within the Church, within that Covenant seekers
must find a body of believers wholly
devoted to something beyond themselves, something beyond their own comfort, something
far beyond their own self-appointed “clubhouse rules”. Within the Church itself, seekers must find –
and be enabled to find – not only the Cross of Christ but our own crosses as
well; for from these Crosses do we find Christ and the fullness of Divine Love.
So within that context of
the Cross and all it represents, what is it we are supposed to do? What are we equipped to do? What are we prepared to do? Compelling questions, all, because on an
individual basis the reasons for attending worship would be as diverse as the
individual; but if none of those reasons are about being connected to the
worship community in a life-changing
way, there is really no reason to merely attend “church”. Because when “going to church” becomes no
more important us than attending a civic club, town council, or Boy Scout
meeting, we are off the holy grid and something has been lost; something which must
be reclaimed.
This is why I think at
least as important as “saving souls” is being about “preserving souls” rather
than “retaining members” because every honest person knows how easily one can
fall. And we should also know how
impossible it is to please everyone’s individual whims. I think of the well-meaning churches that
reach out, go door-to-door, etc., with the assumption
they have whatever it is people outside of their own little churches lack.
I don’t mean to sound so
narrow but judging by some observations, what is largely considered a success
by many of these groups is how many persons they can get to make a verbal commitment to Christ. I have heard of “hundreds” who came for hot
dogs and fun games and found Jesus in the mix, but the math does not match the
photos of half-empty sanctuaries during worship.
A verbal commitment is not
a bad start, of course, and the Holy Spirit can do wondrous things with genuinely
open hearts; but how fruitful can we
consider ourselves to be if our commitment to these new souls ends on a “check
list”? What sort of impact can we be
said to have made for the Kingdom of Heaven if we convince ourselves we have
“saved souls” but have not made new friends or devoted disciples equipped and
prepared for a life beyond their own?
Remember we are not talking about preserving an “institution” by going
on an annual recruiting drive; we are
(or should be) talking about the strength and the purpose of the “ekklesia”
(the whole assembly) to change lives.
We seem to be in an era
of insurmountable challenges. It
actually seems culturally “trendy” to be an atheist. Not long ago I tried to summarize a coherent
list derived from all the self-designated “experts” of how the Church overall
has failed so many. It is not hard to
find articles written by observers who are pretty sure of what turns themselves off to the Church, but who then
pretend to be the voice of many. After
all, how many of us have said to ourselves, “Well, if it bothers me, it must
surely bother others. It is therefore no
good.” By the same token we are just as
likely to say, “Well, if it’s good enough for me and I’m happy with the way
things are, that’s all that matters.”
It wasn’t long before this
list was so redundant and lacking any sense of hope that I began to wonder how
any human institution can deal with such a list! Summarizing these many lists to a manageable
and comprehensible level was daunting, but a pattern soon began to emerge. For me it came down to one word: credibility. The “ekklesia” is not trustworthy. Our collective faith as a community, as an
assembly, is not believable. Of
course we can blame the Conference, the bishop, the liberals, or the
conservatives; but locally, where the spiritual rubber meets the road, the
problem is much deeper – because we’re not calling on people to trust an
institution; we’re asking people to trust “us” to tell them the Truth that is
Christ.
So where is our
collective credibility lacking? Is it that the preacher and the sermons are not
funny enough, or the preacher is not saying the right things? Is it that the choir and the music selections
are not hip-hop enough? Is it that the
ushers are not friendly enough? Is it
that the members themselves out and about in the community are not pious
enough?
These components of the “ekklesia”
may get a nod and a mention here and there, but there is more. As often as it is said that a problem can
rarely be traced to just one thing, we cannot say the personality and
credibility of the “ekklesia” can be reduced to just one person. If a thing is truly bad, it is bad from the
surface to the core; and no one with any connection to the Body can be absolved
of responsibility.
Church can’t pay its
bills? Does this mean the budget is too
big? Or does it mean everyone connected
to that budget is not giving enough? Or
is not giving at all? The Church does
not “do this” or cannot “have that”. Is
it because there aren’t enough people to “do this” or “have that”? Or is it because the people we do have refuse
to participate?
Essentially it boils down
to whether or not an “ekklesia” is actively engaged in the life of Christ. Jesus Himself states clearly, “If
any want to become My followers, let them deny themselves and take up their
cross and follow Me” (Matthew
16:24). The level of faith required
to be able to do this thing, to stop “looking out for #1” for fear that no one
else will, is that faith upon which Jesus said His “ekklesia” would be built (Mt 16:18); a faith so abiding, so much a
part of our being, and so stout that the very “gates of Hades will not prevail
against it”.
We need only to pick up a
newspaper to see the “gates of Hades” seem to be coming loose at the hinges,
but Jesus insists these “gates”, battered and threatening and imposing though
they may sometimes seem, will not prevail against the
collective faith of the “ekklesia”! Do
we really believe that, looking at the state of the world and society as it
currently is?
So it cannot be about
whether we can “do this” or
“have that” as long as enough people show up and sign up; it is entirely about whether
we will do all we are called
and commissioned to do regardless of
how many show up. It is this fundamental
Truth in which the declaration of faith is made: “We are the Church, we are the
Body, we are the Cross, we are the Christ – we are the Word made flesh in the
world today.
But before seekers will
believe it, we must first believe it ourselves.
Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment