Exodus 22:21-27
James 1:22-27
John 14:15-21
“The
most terrible poverty is the loneliness and the feeling of being unloved.” Mother Teresa
Remembering what was perhaps one of the
most shocking sermons I had ever heard, the priest said, “Let it be known here and now that The Lord does not
favor Catholics!” That we were
momentarily stunned is an understatement!
Here we were being all “religious” during worship while celebrating
Christ as Lord of the Church and Savior of the world, and this priest tells us
we’re not doing it right!
This was his first Sunday in the parish,
and he was following a series of priests most of whom could easily be described
as gentle shepherds. They were kind-hearted and soft-spoken, they smiled
and laughed easily, and they soothed us with their words of encouragement even
as they faithfully taught Catholic doctrine. I do not remember any real outcry as they
stood firm in the Church’s teachings which, then and now, go against cultural
trends.
And bear this in mind. This was the 70’s when the nation – and the
Church! - was so enthralled with the so-called Sexual Revolution, abortion, and birth control that we became
much more aware of and concerned with what we could get away with in the
privacy of our homes than we were about the “least among us” (Matthew 25:40).
Well, according to this new guy (who clearly
did not know what he was talking about {tongue in cheek} since we did not agree
with him), we were as wrong as wrong can possibly be! Then he started quoting the Bible. The point the priest was making was not, as
we might suspect, that no one
is favored of The Lord
since our Father “shows no partiality” (Acts
10:34; Romans 2:11).
This was not what the priest was saying at
all. He maintained there are indeed
those who are favored by our God, those to whom our heavenly Father is indeed
partial: it is those who are mistreated, marginalized, oppressed, and never
given a chance to come into their own. The
Lord favors victims of humanity’s
worst.
The Lord favors the “poor”, but not
necessarily the “poor” we often think of only in economic terms. Rather, the priest was referring to the “poor
in spirit” to whom Jesus referred in His Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5:3). He was talking about folks who, lacking in
social affluence, get beaten down by society in general – or worse, are ignored
outright even in their greatest hour of need … because … they just don’t seem
to matter so much – not nearly as much as our own pursuit of personal happiness.
The Bible often makes reference to “widows
and orphans” who have direct access to The Lord’s ear … and heart (Exodus 22:23-24). If they cry out to The Lord as a result of
any sort of abuse or neglect and find themselves without any measure of hope,
The Lord says, “My wrath will burn”; and those guilty of such abuse will soon suffer
the fate of widows and orphans. In the
Jewish Talmud, the Bible is
interpreted as saying caring for widows and orphans is on an equal plane with
caring for our own wives and children.
In the teachings of the rabbis, our own families do not come first if we
are aware of others in distress. They
deserve our equal consideration.
So as the priest pointed out to us, do we
really think Christians (even Catholics!!)
who are guilty of such abuse or neglect will be spared this “burning
wrath” only because we call ourselves “saved”? Have we become so “religious” that we somehow
think only our worship practices – or to merely believe in Jesus - help us to
find favor with The Lord? Or have we
fallen victim to the idea that “church life” and “real life” are mutually
exclusive, that one has nothing to do with the other?
To be sure, “widows and orphans” in
the Bible does literally mean those who are widowed and those who are orphaned,
but there is much more to the context than that they only suffered the loss and
continue to mourn the pain of living without their loved ones. There was – and still is - a cultural loss of
identity, a social stigma that goes much deeper than financial uncertainty, a
stigma that will haunt “widows and orphans” in the dominant
culture unless or until The Lord’s counter-cultural
people intervene. In the “real world”, widows
and orphans are all but deemed to be “non-persons”. They have no clout, no usefulness, no meaning. They are burdens rather than our brethren.
Given that cultural narrative, then, this may
be the reason Jesus very deliberately used the term “orphaned” (John 14:18) toward His disciples who
would soon be without His physical presence.
In that cultural narrative, one who is “orphaned” would be one
without hope, one without any real sense of identity, one who would become lost
in the shuffle of humanity, one without a home to call one’s own, one whose
life has no real social value or even sacred worth.
In Jesus’ entire discourse (John 13-16), He was preparing His
disciples for the day when He would no longer be with them. And while there was the promise of the “Advocate”, the
Holy Spirit (14:16, 26), there is much more to what Jesus was asking of His
disciples – then and now. “Love
one another as I have loved you” (John
13:34; John 15:12). And make no
mistake; Jesus was not talking about “fondness”. He was talking the Cross.
The community of fellowship we more often
refer to as “The Church” is an important component of what Jesus was talking
about in which a “members only” state of mind can be a comfort when we know we are not alone, when we have friends and a
sense of belonging, when help comes to us when we’re at our worst; but that “members
only” attitude can also be a curse when
“love
one another” is misconstrued to mean only those who are useful to us
personally. Remembering Jesus as The Word which became Flesh, our Lord
affirmed the Levitical law of “love your neighbor as yourself” in
His Good Samaritan parable (Luke 10:25-37).
Recall in the parable that a priest and a
Levite, those who would be considered “members”, bypassed the man in
distress. It was the Samaritan, the
outsider, the foreigner who stopped to help.
The Good Samaritan considered nothing but the level of distress he
encountered and his own ability to answer to that distress. It was a moment in which “sacred value” was affirmed
while caring only for one’s own was all but dismissed. This is the abiding principle of “loving one’s
neighbor”.
Our sense of sacred worth is, biblically and
religiously speaking, directly related to the sacred worth we assign to others. We are no better than the worst among us. There are those who can do absolutely nothing
for us socially, but what we can do for them can change their whole world and
their entire outlook on life. It is in
these sacred moments when our religion is at its purest, according to St.
James, and Jesus becomes for them more than what our atheist friends call a “fairy
tale”. It is in these sacred moments
when The Word which became Flesh
remains in the flesh … in our hearts and in our deeds.
In Paul’s Epistle to the Romans, he writes of the “elect”. Often in terms of a grossly misunderstood
doctrine of “predestination” which is largely self-centered, it seems more
likely Paul was referring to the “elect” as those called forth for “extraordinary”
purposes as the Hebrews called forth as The Chosen of The Lord, meant to serve as
a nation of priests to be a light to all the nations. Yet those who do not fall into the “elect”
category are of no less value in the sight of The Lord, for even “ordinary”
acts of kindness and charity – acts of true sacrificial love - can transform
hearts and change lives … and turn our culture and society around.
Mother Teresa taught that there is no
level of distress greater than of the utter loneliness of being unloved, and
she was surely speaking in terms of what the Gospel of our Lord teaches of what
it means to be truly engaged in “pure
religion”. It is not enough to pray
for those in distress and wait for Jesus – or someone else - to handle it. Our Lord said very clearly in speaking to God’s
people, “YOU are the light of the world” (Matthew 5:14).
So we must pray that The Lord will show us
the way of “pure religion”, that form of religion which will always involve “the
least among us” and will always favor those in distress; for our
religion is a matter of justice and mercy for all. We must pray diligently that The Lord will
reveal to US what WE must do in His Holy Name – and then in faith, act upon
what is revealed to us.
In that Sacred Moment at Calvary, our Lord
set us free for this very purpose: to do and to care for those who cannot do
and care for themselves, to restore to them their dignity and identity as
persons of sacred worth, and to remind them that our Lord and Savior is very
real … to them and to us. This isn’t
about our own “personal” salvation … it is entirely about theirs. Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment