“Conscience
and reputation are two things. Conscience is due to yourself, reputation to
your neighbor.” St. Augustine
Sometimes the Bible comes across as written in a
completely unfamiliar language – especially when we read portions literally
(giving the words only “face value”) with no critical analysis, no reasonable
interpretation, no attention to the greater context, and no prayerful
consideration.
The eighth chapter of First Corinthians is only one of many such sections that, when
taken literally, can be easily dismissed as useless or irrelevant today because
Christians have come to believe there is no longer any such thing as “unclean”
meat. As for food offered to an “idol”,
we don’t really see so much of that, either, and likely don’t even know what
Paul means.
We also live in the “land of the free”; and while we
can appreciate that our own individual “rights” may end at the tip of another
person’s nose, we nevertheless demand they move their nose lest they interfere
with our rights! We want to be free to make our own choices
without any outside interference.
It still bothers me somewhat that when the wet/dry
issue was becoming an issue in Columbia County, I simply could not get stirred
up about it. I've shared with you that I
stopped drinking a long time ago and am much better off without it (as anyone
would be), but having bars and liquor stores in town is, to me, unsightly but not
worth getting in a twist over. Yet even
though we know alcohol poses a real danger to some, we demanded our own
“rights” to purchase locally.
When the lottery became an issue, the United Methodist
Church stood against it. I can’t say I
was really ever stirred up about it then (though I advised against it), but I
could (and still can) see that such “pie in the sky” promises never materialize,
that “too good to be true” really is “too good to be true”, and many states
have found that lotteries never live
up to the “Promised Land” hype – but they always
exploit the weakest among us.
Yet we demand the “greater good” of helping some even
if it may harm others.
There is legalized marijuana in some states; legalized
euthanasia in other states; and legalized prostitution in some counties in
Nevada. Alcohol and abortion are legal
in all fifty states, but we still struggle with what some believe are necessary
restrictions we should impose for the sake of public health and safety.
The Living Word, however, is not about what we can do or what we may do and does not recognize “individual rights”; the Written Word is, for the redeemed soul, entirely about
what we must do in accordance with what
is written in the Scriptures for us to know – and for reasons we do not often
understand … unless we take a closer look.
It is a developed
conscience within a sanctified life which can know the difference between right
and wrong based on human reason, the Written Word, the traditional teachings of
the Church, and experiences we have had ourselves.
We must also consider the experiences of others as
well – especially those who are weak and have suffered as a result of our
individual demands.
So even the freedom we Christians celebrate is not
absolute; at least not in Divine terms. “Take
care that this liberty of yours does not somehow become a stumbling block to
the weak” (1 Cor 8:9). The late John Paul II once said, “Freedom consists not in doing what we like,
but in having the right to do as we should.”
So what should
we be concerned with? It is easy to say
it is for the individual to determine his or her personal limits and be
responsible within those limits, but we do not always consider that some among
us simply have a weak constitution.
These “weakest among us” desire and need – and, by
Scriptures and a developed conscience - are entitled to - our full consideration. St. Paul seems to require that we be more concerned about their weakness than
with our own rights. St. Paul is holding
the entire community of the Church responsible for the well-being of the
weakest among us.
Incidentally, so does Jesus hold His disciples
responsible for “causing one of these little ones to sin” (Matthew 18:6).
Paul’s discourse is clearly not about food since “Food will not bring us close to
God. We are no worse off if we do not
eat, and no better off if we do” (1 Cor 8:8). Food offered to idols is only the
contemporary example Paul chose to use, an example that would likely be locally
understood. To summarize the entire
chapter, then, “Paul formulates a general
ethical principle that the [measure] of
[acceptable] personal behavior is its effect on others …”
(Notes, NRSV, New Oxford Annotated Bible, pg 279 NT).
So if we do harm by what we do – in any way whatsoever,
by design or neglect by lack of concern or care for others – our personal
behavior becomes unacceptable. It boils
down to the summary of the ENTIRE LAW: “You shall love your neighbor as yourself” (Galatians 5:14).
This means we as members of the Body of Christ are the
“rudder” on the great ship which is the Church, and the means by which we are
guided is obedience to The Word and
the collective developed conscience
of the community. We operate under the
authority granted to us by The Captain (who is Christ) who calls the orders for
the Ship from the Bridge (Heaven). It is
then the “rudder” which guides the Ship.
Ideally the “rudder” will function strictly according to the “command”
given, but even then all things have to be in place and functioning as they
must – according to our individual spiritual gifts (Romans 12:6-8; 1 Corinthians 12:8-10, 28; Ephesians 4:11).
The Titanic is a good example. Lots of things went wrong leading into that
fateful night, but what ultimately sent the ship to the bottom of the ocean was
a “rudder” too small for the ship’s size and capable speed. It could not dodge the iceberg in time.
Even on a river boat pushing several loaded barges,
the rudder has to be turned early enough to give the heavy load time to
respond. This means the boat’s pilot
must always be looking and thinking ahead long before the boat enters into a
river’s bend – lest the boat run aground.
River sand is incredibly unforgiving.
So nothing can be taken for granted – as the “unsinkable” Titanic that
arrogantly plowed into dangerous waters with known icebergs at full speed.
We have to decide which way we will go and by what
means as we continue to navigate waters known to be dangerous. We can go arrogantly by our own standards at
full speed which is essentially no standard at all since we cannot possibly
agree completely, or we can be guided by the Great Standard which is long and
eternally established by The Almighty Himself and affirmed by Jesus … which, I
will grant, does not always seem so clear.
Yet even if we cannot find our
collective way as One Body, there is one standard by which St. Paul challenges
the Church to measure itself and its effectiveness as The Church: how much (if
any) consideration is given toward those among us who are weak?
There are no easy answers to be given in a sermon or
written in a book or essay. The
“mega-church” pastors who seem to be enjoying great success are good for
perspective, but even they are not
the definitive standard by which all churches can be measured – no matter how
large their churches or how many books they've published. Even these are only a very small part of the
collective Whole and Holy Body of Christ.
Our direction is not about what Adam Hamilton or Mike
Slaughter or Rick Warren or Joel Osteen may suggest – or even by what we may
demand individually. Our direction is
determined by our collective developed
conscience in accordance with where The Great Shepherd will lead us – and –
always with a compassionate eye on those who are weak among us – lest we hit
the iceberg and sink – and put everyone at great risk.
No comments:
Post a Comment